Splunk Is Giving Tough Competition To Other Giants And How

Splunk Is Giving Tough Competition To Other Giants And How

There is a variety of computer data store and processing equipment currently available in the market, but how do you select the right tool for your business?

We usually get stuck in this confusion and try to learn the differences between Splunk and various other tools that are standing in the same queue.

Splunk is a modular and efficient platform for indexing and retrieving log files in a network. It analyzes data generated by the machine in order to provide operational details.

It is mainly used as a web-style platform to browse, track, and review Big Data generated by a computer. In a searchable container from which graphing, surveys, warnings, dashboards, and views can be generated, Splunk collects, indexes, and compares the actual data.

Searching for specific data in a sophisticated data bunch becomes easy with the help of Splunk software. Over time, Splunk has satisfied its users who have put this tool at the top in a queue, and here we’ll distinguish how it is a fierce competition for other devices.

Sumo Logic vs. Splunk

The cloud-native Sumo Logic for time-series metrics and log management is a machine data analytics service. With the Sumo Logic, you can secure, build, and run Azure, AWS, Google Cloud Platform, or hybrid applications.

You can also know about :  Mercedes-Benz Launches Connected Car API-Daimler Splunk’s Data

As opposed to Splunk, the main distinction is that Sumo Logic is optimized for the cloud while Splunk also provides the cloud alternative. The software of Sumo Logic is based only on cloud use.

Sumologic

Sumo Logic is one of the Splunk competitors but it lacks some of the comprehensive functionality while you get all those functionalities with Splunk, especially concerning the Splunk Enterprise offering.

When looking for older material, its Customer Service and its price are on the expensive side; comments were made about the speeds too. Sumo Logic still loses some of Splunk and ELK’s community support.

Logger vs. Splunk

Splunk has a flexible design and horizontal scaling, utilizing MapReduce and exporting a request to many of the indexing pairs. Although this leads to swift searches.

For GUI-based report creation, Logger provides advantages. As the data is normalized, field names remain clear. It is more complicated, though, especially to do anything practical for records other than to convert to PDF or CSV.

Splunk reports can be generated by searching and by inserting “table” inline commands to structure the results. In the Logger, due to SmartConnector event aggregation, there is a lower storage requirement as compared to Splunk, which doesn’t support it.

We saw customers switch from Logger to Splunk and hold the details in the CEF form, so it’s not easy to reap the benefits of pre-existing Splunk applications. Still, it’s a quick migration route that enables robust event encoding, even without sacrificing aggregation.

You can also know about :  Splunk Search Head pooling vs clustering

Splunk vs. QRadar

While both Splunk and QRadar remained excellent products in the SIEM sector, for the more significant part of the decade, Splunk has dominated the market, and Qradar is now struggling to keep up.

IBM Qradar is commonly known to be suitable for other devices like IBM Watson, although Splunk is consistent with other modules within the device as an individual entity.

IBM QRadar can be built with services such as User Behavior Analytics (UBA) and an Azure, AWS, and Office365 safe platform from the QRadar Cloud Protection app.

Though Splunk is well combined with the Splunk User Behaviour Analysis platform (Splunk UBA) to provide a sophisticated research standard. The machine’s personalized intelligence toolkits can also be easily integrated to give better perspectives on phenomena and trends of threats.

QRadar is implemented in many businesses and mildly regulated industries, while in the majority of heavily regulated industries, Splunk is used.

For mid-to-large industries needing core SIEM technology, QRadar can be useful. The IBM Resilient incident response tool is not implemented natively with the QRadar application, and for that reason, you have to buy a premium solution.

However, Splunk is well recognized for its advanced analytics standard, and the Splunk based app Store provides collaboration tools and multiple software. Splunk can also be quite expensive, but it is best for its salient features.

You can also know about :  Splunk Phantom Introduction & Overview

CompareTable

Final thoughts

The current leader is Splunk since Splunk’s platform currently offers better products. However, people consider it quite expensive. But if you take a look at its features against the real needs that you have and then look at the price, you will find it to be the right deal. If you use a limited number of Splunk apps, search elsewhere.

Splunk is very expensive, and it might be worth it as well if you make full use of it. So having a Splunk tool can provide you manifolds of benefits that make it stand the best from others.

One comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.